The closed fist
Today I don't want to talk about technology. I want to talk about something that took me years to understand: how good it is to let go in order to move forward. And how hard it is, because we almost always confuse letting go with *losing*. We feel that releasing a plan, a relationship, a version of ourselves, a business that no longer works, is going backward. And it's exactly the opposite: full hands can't grab anything new.
There's an image that stuck with me: the monkey trap. In some places they catch monkeys with a jar anchored to the ground and a fruit inside. The monkey reaches in, grabs the fruit, but with its fist closed its hand no longer fits through the mouth of the jar. It's free at any moment —it just has to open its hand—. But it doesn't. What traps it isn't the jar: it's its own grip.
You're not trapped by what you hold. You're trapped by not wanting to let it go.
We do that all the time. With ideas, with pride, with «what I already invested», with «what people will think». We carry things that no longer serve us just because opening our hand is hard.
The sunk-cost trap
The most treacherous grip has a name: the sunk cost. We stay attached to something because we already poured a lot into it —time, money, effort, heart—, not because it's worth it going forward. But what you already spent no longer exists, whether you let go or not. It doesn't come back.
Let go of control, not the wheel
Here's a misunderstanding worth dismantling: letting go isn't giving up. It's not becoming passive or ceasing to try. It's no longer demanding an exact shape from the world and keeping the direction instead. The Stoics put it simply: focus on what depends on you, release what doesn't. And something strange and beautiful happens: when you let go of the outcome, you act better, because you stop fighting what you don't control.
Letting go of control isn't letting go of the wheel. You're still steering the boat; you just stop pretending you also command the wind.
You let go in layers
Another lie we tell ourselves is that letting go is a heroic act done in a single day. Almost never. It's loosening the fist finger by finger, a little at a time. And it's okay if it hurts for a while —the grief is proof that it mattered—. You don't have to let go feeling nothing. You just have to let go.
What you release transforms
The Japanese repair broken pottery with gold: it's kintsugi. The crack isn't hidden, it's honored. The piece is worth more broken and mended than intact, because it tells a story. What we let go of works the same way: it isn't lost, it leaves us shape. You don't come back empty from a closure, a goodbye, a failure. You come back different, with a line of gold where there used to be a crack.
And yes, a nod to my world even though I promised not to talk about technology: automating is letting go of tasks to grab the ones that matter. Delegating the repetitive is letting go of control over the *how* to keep the *why*. The same philosophy, in code.
An act of trust
Deep down, letting go is an act of trust in your future self. You tell it: «I'll be fine without this, because what's coming is worth it». Holding on, almost always, is fear disguised as loyalty. So if there's something you're gripping with a closed fist today —a project, an idea of yourself, a grudge, an old version of your life— maybe the jar isn't what traps you. Your hand is. And that one, you can open whenever you want.
Ask this article
Eathan · Farid's AI, anchored to the text
Answers based only on this article.
Could this help your business?
Get a free AI diagnosis, tailored to your case in 60 seconds: what to automate, what stack and the first step.